动力扰动下不同硬度煤层巷道围岩响应特征研究

采矿与安全工程学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 555-559.

动力扰动下不同硬度煤层巷道围岩响应特征研究

1．中国矿业大学矿业工程学院，深部煤炭资源开采教育部重点实验室，江苏徐州 221116； 2．兖矿集团博士后工作站，山东邹城 273500

出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2013-07-09
作者简介:温颖远(1986-)，男，山东省潍坊市人，研究生，从事冲击矿压、采矿地球物理等方面的研究。 E-mail：wyycumt@126.com Tel：13407536506
基金资助:
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2012BAK09B01)；国家自然科学基金项目(511104150)；江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目

The response features of roadway surrounding rock in different hardness coal seams under dynamic disturbance

Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-07-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨动力扰动对不同硬度煤层巷道围岩稳定性的影响规律，对动力扰动下不同硬度煤层巷道围岩力学响应进行了数值分析。结果表明：动力扰动对软硬煤煤层巷道围岩稳定性显著影响时间为0.4 s；在巷道顶板水平应力波动幅值、顶板及帮部围岩变形程度方面，软煤大于硬煤，而在帮部垂直应力波动幅值、底板水平应力波动幅值、底板变形程度及帮部和底板的塑性区面积方面，硬煤大于软煤；软硬煤煤层巷道顶板变形程度均大于底板和帮部，软煤帮部变形程度明显大于底板；在巷道变形位移显著上升时间段内，软硬煤煤层巷道帮部和底板位移变化速率不一致，而顶板位移变化速率一致。

关键词: 动力扰动, 力学响应, 巷道围岩

Abstract: In order to study the influence principles of dynamic disturbance on roadway surrounding rock in different hardness coal seams, the paper numerically analyses the stress response of roadway surrounding rock under dynamic disturbance. The results demonstrate that the average period that the dynamic disturbance has effect on the steady of rock is 0.4 s. The soft coal’s is more serious than the hard coal’s when compared with the horizontal stress amplitude of roof rock and the deformation of roof and side roadway. However, the hard coal’s is more serious than soft coal’s when compared with the vertical stress amplitude of side roadway, the horizontal stress amplitude of floor rock, the deformation of floor rock and the plasticity zone of floor and side roadway. The deformation of roof rock is more serious than that of floor and side roadway in two kinds of coal seam, and in soft coal seam the deformation of side roadway is more serious than that of floor rock. During the increasing period of roadway deformation, the rate of rise is different in side roadway and floor roadway, but is same in roof rock.

Key words: dynamic disturbance, mechanic response, roadway surrounding rock

温颖远, 牟宗龙, 易恩兵, 王浩, 刘振江. 动力扰动下不同硬度煤层巷道围岩响应特征研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(4): 555-559.

WEN Ying-yuan, MOU Zong-long, YI En-bing, WANG Hao, LIU Zhen-jiang. The response features of roadway surrounding rock in different hardness coal seams under dynamic disturbance[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2013, 30(4): 555-559.

[1]	靖洪文，孟庆彬，朱俊福，孟波，蔚立元. 深部巷道围岩松动圈稳定控制理论与技术进展[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(3): 429-442.
[2]	张俊文，宋治祥. 深部砂岩三轴加卸载力学响应及其破坏特征[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(2): 409-418.
[3]	冯国瑞，王贵文，王朋飞，郭军，闫勇敢，任玉琦. 石炭二叠系火成岩侵入区特厚煤层采区停采煤柱合理宽度研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2019, 36(1): 87-94.
[4]	侯定贵，杨晓杰，王嘉敏. 巷道围岩失稳监测技术及应用[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2019, 36(1): 122-130.
[5]	朱鹏瑞，宋卫东，曹帅，万飞，郑迪. 爆破动载下胶结充填体的张拉力学响应机制[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2018, 35(3): 605-.
[6]	唐礼忠, 高龙华, 王春, 蒋锋 . 动力扰动下含软弱夹层巷道围岩稳定性数值分析 [J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2016, 33(1): 63-69.
[7]	李明, 茅献彪, 茅蓉蓉, 陶静. 基于尖点突变模型的巷道围岩屈曲失稳规律研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2014, 31(3): 379-384.
[8]	张小波, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞. 考虑峰后应变软化与扩容的圆形巷道围岩弹塑性D-P准则解[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(6): 903-910.
[9]	黄文忠, 王卫军, 余伟健. 深部高应力碎胀围岩二次支护参数研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(5): 665-672.
[10]	王渭明, 赵增辉, 王磊. 考虑刚度和强度劣化时弱胶结软岩巷道围岩的弹塑性损伤分析[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(5): 679-685.
[11]	罗周全, 管佳林, 冯富康. 盘区隔离矿柱采场结构参数数值优化[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2012, 29(2): 261-264.