采场底板高承压水突水“三场”演化研究

采矿与安全工程学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 213-218.

采场底板高承压水突水“三场”演化研究

1．中国矿业大学安全工程学院，江苏徐州 221116； 2．中国矿业大学煤矿瓦斯与火灾防治教育部重点实验室，江苏徐州 221116

收稿日期:2014-03-17 出版日期:2015-03-15 发布日期:2015-06-23
作者简介:沈荣喜(1976—)，男，陕西省宁强县人，副教授，工学博士，从事含水煤岩稳定性方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51104156)；教育部科学技术研究项目(113031A)；江苏省优势学科建设工程项目

＂Three fields＂evolution of water inrush process under high confined water in stope floor

Received:2014-03-17 Online:2015-03-15 Published:2015-06-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采场底板承压水严重威胁着工作面的安全生产。通过理论分析建立了裂缝尖端力学模型，推导了裂缝力学平衡方程，分析了高承压水上工作面回采引发底板突水的裂缝扩展条件；利用 RFPA 软件模拟分析了承压水上工作面回采期间围岩应力场、损伤场与渗流场的演化过程，揭示了煤层底板承压水突水机制。研究结果表明：导水裂缝的扩展条件是孔隙水压力与地应力的合力大于煤岩体内部黏聚力；采矿活动改变了围岩应力场分布，造成局部应力集中，并引发煤岩体内部损伤破坏，大规模突水后主应力比裂纹开始扩展时显著增大；内部损伤增强了煤岩体的渗透性，增大了渗流场影响区域。

关键词: 承压水, 煤层开采, 底板突水, 三场, 演化

Abstract: Mine confined water is a serious threat for the safety production of underground coal face. Through theoretical analysis, a mechanics model of crack tip was established, the equilibrium equation of fracture mechanics was deduced, and the crack propagation condition of floor water inrush caused by mining on high confined water were analyzed. In addition, evolution process of rock stress field, damage field and seepage field under mining were simulated by RFPA, and the mechanism of confined water inrush was further revealed. The results show that the propagation condition of water flowing crack is that the resultant force of pore water pressure and t in-situ stress should be greater than the internal cohesion of coal-rock mass. Surrounding rock stress distribution has been changed by mining activities, which also causes local stress concentration and damage within coal-rock mass. After a large-scale water inrush appears, the principal stress is significantly larger than that in crack initiation. Duo to internal damage, the permeability of coal-rock mass increases, and the affected area of seepage field also increases.

Key words: confined water, coal mining, floor water inrush, three fields, evolution

沈荣喜, 邱黎明, 李保林, 孔彪, 钮月. 采场底板高承压水突水“三场”演化研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2015, 32(2): 213-218.

SHEN Rong-Xi, QIU Li-Ming, LI Bao-Lin, KONG Biao, NIU Yue. ＂Three fields＂evolution of water inrush process under high confined water in stope floor[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2015, 32(2): 213-218.

[1]	王厚柱，鞠远江，秦坤坤，胡友彪. 深部近距离煤层开采底板破坏规律实测对比研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(3): 553-561.
[2]	刘斌，赵毅鑫，张汉，袁耀. 单轴压缩及劈裂试验下煤的声发射特征研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(3): 613-621.
[3]	李建伟，刘长友，卜庆为. 浅埋厚煤层开采覆岩采动裂缝时空演化规律[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(2): 238-246.
[4]	巨峰，宁湃，何泽全，肖猛，王广伟. 压实过程中煤矸石颗粒流细观演化规律研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37(1): 183-191.
[5]	樊克松，申宝宏，黄志增，潘黎明，薛吉胜，赵铁林. 基于远场周期来压的地表动态下沉预计[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2019, 36(6): 1213-1221.
[6]	张培森，武守鑫，颜伟，安羽枫，段中稳，孙亚楠. 煤层底板承压水导升监测系统研发与应用[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2019, 36(3): 549-557.
[7]	谢生荣，郜明明，陈冬冬，岳帅帅，潘浩，曾俊超，索海翔. 充填开采采场球应力壳分布及演化规律研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2019, 36(1): 16-23.
[8]	李春意，高永格，崔希民，袁德宝，何荣. 云驾岭矿厚煤层综采地表沉陷时空演化规律研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2019, 36(1): 37-43.
[9]	洛锋，曹树刚，李国栋，李勇，李奇贤. 近距离下行逐层开采底板应变时空差异特征[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2018, 35(5): 997-1004.
[10]	白继文，刘人太，蒋宇静，蔚立元，张红军，李卫. 条带充填置换开采围岩变形及承压水导升规律[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2018, 35(2): 352-359.
[11]	华心祝，杨明，刘钦节，杨朋. 深井沿空留巷底鼓演化机理模型试验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2018, 35(1): 1-9.
[12]	何团，黄志增，李春睿，洛锋，王东攀. 特厚煤层综放工作面侧向煤体应力时空演化特征[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2018, 35(1): 100-105.
[13]	赵同彬，程康康，魏平，傅知勇，李刚. 含弱面岩石滑移破坏及锚固控制试验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2017, 34(6): 1081-1087.
[14]	姚琦，冯涛，廖泽，马超甫. 急倾斜走向分段充填顶板初次断裂应力分布规律[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2017, 34(6): 1148-1155.
[15]	许延春，谢小锋，刘世奇，李昆奇，王焕忠. 注浆加固工作面底板岩体力学性质增强-损伤的定量测定[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2017, 34(6): 1186-1193.